MRINMOY BOSE AND ORS NAMRATA CHATTERJEE vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR — CRR /305/2022

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure ,1973 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 24th March 2026.

CNR: WBCHCJ0059252022

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

20th December 2022

Filing Number

CRR /305/2022

Filing Date

16-12-2022

Registration No

CRR /305/2022

Registration Date

16-12-2022

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE JAY SENGUPTA

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE JAY SENGUPTA

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )

Sub-Category

Quashing of Proceedings ( 75 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL SECTION

Decision Date

24th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure ,1973 Section 482
Indian Penal Code Act ,1860 Section 406/409/420/34

Petitioner(s)

MRINMOY BOSE AND ORS NAMRATA CHATTERJEE

Respondent(s)

STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE JAY SENGUPTA

20-12-2022

NEW MOTION

24-03-2026

CRIMINAL MOTION

23-03-2026

CRIMINAL MOTION

18-03-2026

CRIMINAL MOTION

21-01-2025

CONTESTED APPLICATION(CRIMINAL)

Orders

24-03-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE JAY SENGUPTA

The High Court at Calcutta (Circuit Bench, Jalpaiguri) dismissed Criminal Revision Application 305 of 2022 for default on March 24, 2026, as the petitioners failed to appear or seek accommodation despite the State's representation. Justice Jay Sengupta ordered that certified copies be supplied upon compliance with formalities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court at Calcutta (Circuit Bench, Jalpaiguri) dismissed Criminal Revision Application 305 of 2022 for default on March 24, 2026, as the petitioners failed to appear or seek accommodation despite the State's representation. Justice Jay Sengupta ordered that certified copies be supplied upon compliance with formalities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case