LITON ORAON AND ANR ASIT CHANDA vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL — CRM(NDPS)/485/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 25th March 2026.

CNR: WBCHCJ0056052025

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

16th December 2025

Filing Number

CRM(NDPS) /478/2025

Filing Date

21-11-2025

Registration No

CRM(NDPS) /485/2025

Registration Date

21-11-2025

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )

Sub-Category

Bail/Cancellation of bail ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL SECTION

Decision Date

25th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--REJECTED

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483

Petitioner(s)

LITON ORAON AND ANR ASIT CHANDA

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK

16-12-2025

APPLICATION FOR BAIL

25-03-2026

APPLICATION FOR BAIL

23-12-2025

APPLICATION FOR BAIL

22-12-2025

APPLICATION FOR BAIL

19-12-2025

APPLICATION FOR BAIL

Orders

25-03-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK

The Calcutta High Court Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri rejected the bail application of Liton Oraon and another petitioner in an NDPS case. The court found that approximately 22 grams of ganja recovered from their joint possession constituted a commercial quantity of contraband, bringing the case within the stringent restrictions of Section 37 of the NDPS Act, 1985, which the petitioners could not overcome. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Calcutta High Court Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri rejected the bail application of Liton Oraon and another petitioner in an NDPS case. The court found that approximately 22 grams of ganja recovered from their joint possession constituted a commercial quantity of contraband, bringing the case within the stringent restrictions of Section 37 of the NDPS Act, 1985, which the petitioners could not overcome. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case