AMINUR HOQUE @ AMINUL HOQUE SUDIP GUHA vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR — CRR/235/2023

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Act ,1974 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 19th May 2026.

CNR: WBCHCJ0049062023

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

05th September 2023

Filing Number

CRR/235/2023

Filing Date

01-09-2023

Registration No

CRR/235/2023

Registration Date

01-09-2023

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE KRISHNA RAO

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE KRISHNA RAO

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )

Sub-Category

Exercise of inherent power u/s 482 Cr. P. C. ( 40 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL SECTION

Decision Date

19th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Act ,1974 Section 482

Petitioner(s)

AMINUR HOQUE @ AMINUL HOQUE SUDIP GUHA

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE KRISHNA RAO

05-09-2023

CRIMINAL REVISION

19-05-2026

CRIMINAL REVISION

16-05-2026

CRIMINAL REVISION

15-05-2026

CRIMINAL REVISION

14-05-2026

CRIMINAL REVISION

Orders

19-05-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE KRISHNA RAO

The High Court at Calcutta dismissed petitioner Aminur Hoque's revision petition seeking quashment of criminal proceedings under IPC sections 448/341/323/325/326/307/354/427/506/34 (Dinhata PS Case 285/2023). The court found sufficient materials on record and determined the allegations must be decided at trial, holding there was no merit in the quashment prayer. The trial court was directed to expedite proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court at Calcutta dismissed petitioner Aminur Hoque's revision petition seeking quashment of criminal proceedings under IPC sections 448/341/323/325/326/307/354/427/506/34 (Dinhata PS Case 285/2023). The court found sufficient materials on record and determined the allegations must be decided at trial, holding there was no merit in the quashment prayer. The trial court was directed to expedite proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case