RAMESH SHAH AND ANR SITESH KUMAR GUPTA vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL — CRM(A)/626/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 15th December 2025.
CNR: WBCHCJ0042492025
Filing Number
CRM(A)/617/2025
Filing Date
20-Aug-2025
Registration No
CRM(A)/626/2025
Registration Date
20-Aug-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Jay Sengupta
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Jay Sengupta
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )
Sub-Category
Anticipatory Bail ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL SECTION
Decision Date
15-Dec-2025
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Last updated 27-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAMESH SHAH AND ANR SITESH KUMAR GUPTA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Jay SenguptaView PDF
The High Court at Calcutta (Jalpaiguri Circuit Bench) dismissed the anticipatory bail application (CRAN 1 of 2026) filed by Ramesh Shah for default. The dismissal was ordered because the applicants failed to appear before the court on multiple occasions (19/3/2026 and 20/3/2026) and did not seek any accommodation for adjournment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Jay SenguptaView PDF
-
20-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Jay SenguptaView PDF
-
19-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Jay SenguptaView PDF
-
18-Mar-2026
Modification/Relaxation Of Anticipatory Bail
Hon'ble Justice Jay Sengupta
-
15-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Justice Tapabrata ChakrabortyView PDF
-
27-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Justice Bivas PattanayakView PDF
-
09-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Justice Dinesh Kumar SharmaView PDF
-
09-Sep-2025
Application For Anticipatory Bail
Hon'ble Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma
-
22-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CRM(A)/626/2025
The High Court at Calcutta (Jalpaiguri Circuit Bench) dismissed the anticipatory bail application (CRAN 1 of 2026) filed by Ramesh Shah for default. The dismissal was ordered because the applicants failed to appear before the court on multiple occasions (19/3/2026 and 20/3/2026) and did not seek any accommodation for adjournment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts