RONI CHAKRABORTY@RANI CHAKRABORTY MR.TAPODIP GUPTA vs THEATE OF WEST BENGAL — CRM(A)/606/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED FOR NON PROSECUTION on 24th November 2025.

CNR: WBCHCJ0041502025

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

20th August 2025

Filing Number

CRM(A) /597/2025

Filing Date

18-08-2025

Registration No

CRM(A) /606/2025

Registration Date

18-08-2025

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE JAY SENGUPTA

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE JAY SENGUPTA

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )

Sub-Category

Anticipatory Bail ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL SECTION

Decision Date

24th November 2025

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED FOR NON PROSECUTION

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 482

Petitioner(s)

RONI CHAKRABORTY@RANI CHAKRABORTY MR.TAPODIP GUPTA

Respondent(s)

THEATE OF WEST BENGAL

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE JAY SENGUPTA

20-08-2025

APPLICATION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL

27-03-2026

APPLICATION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL

25-03-2026

APPLICATION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL

19-02-2026

APPLICATION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL

18-02-2026

APPLICATION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL

Orders

27-03-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE JAY SENGUPTA

The High Court at Calcutta granted anticipatory bail to Roni Chakraborty in an NDPS case, finding that absent direct incriminating evidence beyond co-accused statements, the petitioner successfully rebutted Section 37 restrictions. The bail was granted on condition of furnishing Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties and compliance with court attendance and witness protection requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court at Calcutta granted anticipatory bail to Roni Chakraborty in an NDPS case, finding that absent direct incriminating evidence beyond co-accused statements, the petitioner successfully rebutted Section 37 restrictions. The bail was granted on condition of furnishing Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties and compliance with court attendance and witness protection requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case