THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL SUBHASIS MISHHRA vs RAJENDRA KUMAR YADAV — CRM(M)/195/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483(2). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 27th April 2026.
CNR: WBCHCJ0038352025
Next Hearing
11th August 2025
Filing Number
CRM(M) /195/2025
Filing Date
31-07-2025
Registration No
CRM(M) /195/2025
Registration Date
31-07-2025
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJASEKHAR MANTHA
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJASEKHAR MANTHA
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )
Sub-Category
Bail/Cancellation of bail ( 11 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL SECTION
Decision Date
27th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL SUBHASIS MISHHRA
Respondent(s)
RAJENDRA KUMAR YADAV
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJASEKHAR MANTHA
CANCELLATION OF BAIL
CANCELLATION OF BAIL
CANCELLATION OF BAIL
CANCELLATION OF BAIL
CANCELLATION OF BAIL
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11-08-2025 | CANCELLATION OF BAIL | |
| 27-04-2026 | CANCELLATION OF BAIL | |
| 27-03-2026 | CANCELLATION OF BAIL | |
| 25-03-2026 | CANCELLATION OF BAIL | |
| 17-02-2026 | CANCELLATION OF BAIL |
Orders
The High Court at Calcutta cancelled bail granted to Rajendra Kumar Yadav in an NDPS case, finding that the trial court was misled by fraudulent evidence. The court determined that a lease agreement presented to justify the accused's innocence was forged—containing unauthorized overwriting, a non-existent mobile number, and was allegedly executed after the co-party had died. Consequently, the bail was cancelled and the petitioner was ordered to surrender and be taken into custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court at Calcutta cancelled bail granted to Rajendra Kumar Yadav in an NDPS case, finding that the trial court was misled by fraudulent evidence. The court determined that a lease agreement presented to justify the accused's innocence was forged—containing unauthorized overwriting, a non-existent mobile number, and was allegedly executed after the co-party had died. Consequently, the bail was cancelled and the petitioner was ordered to surrender and be taken into custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts