ASHOK KUMAR RAY@ASHOK ROY ROUMYADIP SAHA vs AMIT AGARWAL AND ORS — FMAT/18/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Act ,1908 Section N/A. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 07th April 2026.
CNR: WBCHCJ0038272025
Next Hearing
01st August 2025
Filing Number
FMAT /17/2025
Filing Date
30-07-2025
Registration No
FMAT /18/2025
Registration Date
30-07-2025
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD , HON'BLE JUSTICE PRASENJIT BISWAS
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD , HON'BLE JUSTICE PRASENJIT BISWAS
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 57 )
Judicial Branch
STAMP REPORTER (SR) SECTION
Decision Date
07th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ASHOK KUMAR RAY@ASHOK ROY ROUMYADIP SAHA
Respondent(s)
AMIT AGARWAL AND ORS
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD , HON'BLE JUSTICE PRASENJIT BISWAS
FOR ADMISSION
ORDER XLI RULE 11
ORDER XLI RULE 11
ORDER XLI RULE 11
ORDER XLI RULE 11
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 01-08-2025 | FOR ADMISSION | |
| 07-04-2026 | ORDER XLI RULE 11 | |
| 27-03-2026 | ORDER XLI RULE 11 | |
| 25-03-2026 | ORDER XLI RULE 11 | |
| 24-03-2026 | ORDER XLI RULE 11 |
Orders
The Calcutta High Court's Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri corrected an inadvertent typographical error in its order dated 07.04.2026, where the word "suit" was wrongly used instead of "application" in paragraph 18. The court directed that "suit" be read as "application" and modified the order accordingly. This was a clerical correction that was uncontested by both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Calcutta High Court's Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri corrected an inadvertent typographical error in its order dated 07.04.2026, where the word "suit" was wrongly used instead of "application" in paragraph 18. The court directed that "suit" be read as "application" and modified the order accordingly. This was a clerical correction that was uncontested by both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts