SHRABANI DAM@SRABANI DAM ROUMYADIP SAHA vs MUKUL DUTTA AND ANR — CO/84/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Act ,1908 Section N/A. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: WBCHCJ0024452026

Filing Number

CO/85/2026

Filing Date

16-Jun-2026

Registration No

CO/84/2026

Registration Date

17-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 57 )

Judicial Branch

RULE SECTION

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Act ,1908 Section N/A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHRABANI DAM@SRABANI DAM ROUMYADIP SAHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MUKUL DUTTA AND ANR

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi BhattacharyyaView PDF

    Case Summary: CO 84/2026 Outcome: The Calcutta High Court granted interim stay of execution proceedings and admitted the revisional petition for substantive hearing. The Court found that the trial judge erred in dismissing the petitioner's stay application related to her pending suit restoration plea (Order IX Rule 13, CPC). Since the petitioner raised prima facie grounds that summons was improperly served by hanging on the door, identified by someone 10-15 km away, the execution case should be stayed pending disposal of the restoration application. The matter is listed for next Circuit hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    CIVIL Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya

  4. 16-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CO/84/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CO 84/2026 Outcome: The Calcutta High Court granted interim stay of execution proceedings and admitted the revisional petition for substantive hearing. The Court found that the trial judge erred in dismissing the petitioner's stay application related to her pending suit restoration plea (Order IX Rule 13, CPC). Since the petitioner raised prima facie grounds that summons was improperly served by hanging on the door, identified by someone 10-15 km away, the execution case should be stayed pending disposal of the restoration application. The matter is listed for next Circuit hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case