MADHAB BARMAN KRIISHNA PADA SANTRA vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS — WPA/948/2026
Case under West Bengal Panchayat Act ,1973 Section N/A. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 18th June 2026.
CNR: WBCHCJ0023912026
Filing Number
WPA/967/2026
Filing Date
15-Jun-2026
Registration No
WPA/948/2026
Registration Date
17-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 7 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
18-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MADHAB BARMAN KRIISHNA PADA SANTRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Justice Bivas PattanayakView PDF
The High Court at Calcutta granted the petitioner's writ petition and directed West Bengal's pension authorities to disburse interest at 8% per annum on delayed gratuity payment to the widow of a deceased Panchayat Executive Assistant, from January 11, 2021 (date after wife's death) until actual payment, within six weeks. The court held that while the petitioner sought 18% interest, the state's duty to promptly disburse pensionary benefits entitles delayed recipients to interest compensation, though the court reduced the rate to 8%. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Jun-2026
Interest On Gratuity
Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak
-
15-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPA/948/2026
The High Court at Calcutta granted the petitioner's writ petition and directed West Bengal's pension authorities to disburse interest at 8% per annum on delayed gratuity payment to the widow of a deceased Panchayat Executive Assistant, from January 11, 2021 (date after wife's death) until actual payment, within six weeks. The court held that while the petitioner sought 18% interest, the state's duty to promptly disburse pensionary benefits entitles delayed recipients to interest compensation, though the court reduced the rate to 8%. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts