Sree Brindaban Rice Mills And Ors SUMAN SAHA vs State Bank of India And Anr — CO/82/2026
Case under Specific Relief Act ,1963 Section NA. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: WBCHCJ0023862026
Filing Number
CO/84/2026
Filing Date
15-Jun-2026
Registration No
CO/82/2026
Registration Date
15-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 57 )
Judicial Branch
RULE SECTION
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sree Brindaban Rice Mills And Ors SUMAN SAHA
Respondent(s)
-
1.State Bank of India And Anr
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
17-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi BhattacharyyaView PDF
Summary of CO 82/2026 The Calcutta High Court's Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri entertained Sree Brindaban Rice Mills' Article 227 revisional petition, finding the Debt Recovery Tribunal's orders dated March 12 and 26, 2026 vitiated by violation of natural justice (audi alteram partem), as petitioner's counsel was not given opportunity to address the bank's written objections despite receiving them same-day. The court also flagged potential jurisdictional defects in the District Magistrate's SARFAESI Act Section 14 order. The case is adjourned for substantive hearing; bank's asset possession taken on June 4, 2026 is made subject to the petition's outcome, and status quo on the property is maintained until August 31, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Jun-2026
Contested Application
Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya
-
16-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi BhattacharyyaView PDF
-
16-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CO/82/2026
Summary of CO 82/2026 The Calcutta High Court's Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri entertained Sree Brindaban Rice Mills' Article 227 revisional petition, finding the Debt Recovery Tribunal's orders dated March 12 and 26, 2026 vitiated by violation of natural justice (audi alteram partem), as petitioner's counsel was not given opportunity to address the bank's written objections despite receiving them same-day. The court also flagged potential jurisdictional defects in the District Magistrate's SARFAESI Act Section 14 order. The case is adjourned for substantive hearing; bank's asset possession taken on June 4, 2026 is made subject to the petition's outcome, and status quo on the property is maintained until August 31, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts