SUJIT THAKUR@SUJIT KUMAR AND ANR HILLOL SAHA PODDER vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL — CRM(A)/349/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 16th June 2026.
CNR: WBCHCJ0023052026
Filing Number
CRM(A)/357/2026
Filing Date
12-Jun-2026
Registration No
CRM(A)/349/2026
Registration Date
15-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )
Sub-Category
Anticipatory Bail ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL SECTION
Decision Date
16-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUJIT THAKUR@SUJIT KUMAR AND ANR HILLOL SAHA PODDER
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)View PDF
The Calcutta High Court Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri rejected the anticipatory bail application of Sujit Thakur and another in connection with Siliguri Police Station Case No. 657 of 2025, which involves charges under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The court found that a government hospital injury report documented a stab injury over the right upper chest wall of the victim, and based on the serious nature of this injury and materials on record, determined it was not a fit case for granting anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Jun-2026
Application For Anticipatory Bail
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)
-
12-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRM(A)/349/2026
The Calcutta High Court Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri rejected the anticipatory bail application of Sujit Thakur and another in connection with Siliguri Police Station Case No. 657 of 2025, which involves charges under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The court found that a government hospital injury report documented a stab injury over the right upper chest wall of the victim, and based on the serious nature of this injury and materials on record, determined it was not a fit case for granting anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts