RAKHAL CHANDRA DUTTA AND ANR MAMATAJ KHATUN vs SUKHENDRA NATH BANIK — CO/83/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Act ,1908 Section N/A. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 16th June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 16-Jun-2026

CNR: WBCHCJ0022992026

Filing Number

CO/83/2026

Filing Date

11-Jun-2026

Registration No

CO/83/2026

Registration Date

15-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 57 )

Judicial Branch

RULE SECTION

Decision Date

16-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Act ,1908 Section N/A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAKHAL CHANDRA DUTTA AND ANR MAMATAJ KHATUN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUKHENDRA NATH BANIK

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi BhattacharyyaView PDF

    The Calcutta High Court dismissed the petitioners' Section 47 application challenging the lower court's dismissal of their plea, holding that arguments regarding execution case maintainability do not extend to attacking the decree's validity itself. However, the court clarified that judgment-debtors may file proper written objections challenging the execution proceedings on merits, which the executing court must consider independently without prejudice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    CIVIL Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya

  4. 11-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CO/83/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Calcutta High Court dismissed the petitioners' Section 47 application challenging the lower court's dismissal of their plea, holding that arguments regarding execution case maintainability do not extend to attacking the decree's validity itself. However, the court clarified that judgment-debtors may file proper written objections challenging the execution proceedings on merits, which the executing court must consider independently without prejudice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case