ANISUL ALAM AND ANR SUBHASISH MISRA vs THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY LAND REFORMS AND ORS — MAT/30/2025

Case under Land Acquisition (amendment) Act ,1962 Section N/A. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 13th May 2025.

CNR: WBCHCJ0022972025

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

02nd May 2025

Filing Number

MAT /30/2025

Filing Date

29-04-2025

Registration No

MAT /30/2025

Registration Date

29-04-2025

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD , HON'BLE JUSTICE PRASENJIT BISWAS

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD , HON'BLE JUSTICE PRASENJIT BISWAS

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

ACQUISITION & REQUISITION OF LAND ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

STAMP REPORTER (SR) SECTION

Decision Date

13th May 2025

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act ,1962 Section N/A

Petitioner(s)

ANISUL ALAM AND ANR SUBHASISH MISRA

Respondent(s)

THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY LAND REFORMS AND ORS

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD , HON'BLE JUSTICE PRASENJIT BISWAS

02-05-2025

APPLICATION

13-04-2026

APPLICATION

Orders

13-04-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD,HON'BLE JUSTICE PRASENJIT BISWAS

The Calcutta High Court at Jalpaiguri dismissed CAN 2 of 2025 as not pressed, after the applicants' advocate conceded that the application was filed under a misconception of law and withdrew it. The court accepted the withdrawal without adjudicating the substantive merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Calcutta High Court at Jalpaiguri dismissed CAN 2 of 2025 as not pressed, after the applicants' advocate conceded that the application was filed under a misconception of law and withdrew it. The court accepted the withdrawal without adjudicating the substantive merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case