PROMILA BARMAN ROY JONAKI SAHA vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS — WPA/888/2026
Case under West Bengal Board of Secondary Education Act ,1963 Section N/A. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 16th June 2026.
CNR: WBCHCJ0022712026
Filing Number
WPA/908/2026
Filing Date
11-Jun-2026
Registration No
WPA/888/2026
Registration Date
15-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Secondary Education Post Retirement ( 28 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
16-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PROMILA BARMAN ROY JONAKI SAHA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Justice Bivas PattanayakView PDF
Case Summary: WPA 888/2026 – Promila Barman Roy v. The State of West Bengal The High Court at Calcutta allowed the widow's petition for interest on delayed gratuity and pension payments. The petitioner's husband, a Group-D school employee, died in July 2025, with pension orders issued January 2026 but actual disbursement delayed until February 2026. The court found considerable delay in payment and ruled that the State has a duty to disburse pensionary benefits promptly. The court directed the Director of Pension and Treasury Officer to pay 8% per annum interest (rather than the requested 18%) from the date after death until actual payment, within six weeks of order communication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Jun-2026
Interest On Gratuity
Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak
-
11-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPA/888/2026
Case Summary: WPA 888/2026 – Promila Barman Roy v. The State of West Bengal The High Court at Calcutta allowed the widow's petition for interest on delayed gratuity and pension payments. The petitioner's husband, a Group-D school employee, died in July 2025, with pension orders issued January 2026 but actual disbursement delayed until February 2026. The court found considerable delay in payment and ruled that the State has a duty to disburse pensionary benefits promptly. The court directed the Director of Pension and Treasury Officer to pay 8% per annum interest (rather than the requested 18%) from the date after death until actual payment, within six weeks of order communication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts