KALPANA PRADHAN ANIRBAN CHAKRABORTY vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS — WPA/878/2026

Case under West Bengal Board of Primary Education Act ,1973 Section N/A. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 16th June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 16-Jun-2026

CNR: WBCHCJ0022542026

Filing Number

WPA/894/2026

Filing Date

11-Jun-2026

Registration No

WPA/878/2026

Registration Date

12-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Primary Education Post Retirement ( 39 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

16-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

West Bengal Board of Primary Education Act ,1973 Section N/A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KALPANA PRADHAN ANIRBAN CHAKRABORTY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Bivas PattanayakView PDF

    The High Court at Calcutta granted the petition of Kalpana Pradhan, a retired Assistant Teacher, directing the State to disburse interest at 8% per annum on delayed gratuity and arrear pension payments. The petitioner retired on 28 February 2021 but received her benefits only on 22 August 2021 (over five months later), and the court held she was entitled to compensation interest for this delay, to be paid within six weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    Interest On Gratuity

    Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak

  4. 11-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPA/878/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court at Calcutta granted the petition of Kalpana Pradhan, a retired Assistant Teacher, directing the State to disburse interest at 8% per annum on delayed gratuity and arrear pension payments. The petitioner retired on 28 February 2021 but received her benefits only on 22 August 2021 (over five months later), and the court held she was entitled to compensation interest for this delay, to be paid within six weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case