PRADIP ROY ANIRBAN BANERJEE vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR — CRM(A)/347/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th June 2026.
CNR: WBCHCJ0022302026
Filing Number
CRM(A)/352/2026
Filing Date
10-Jun-2026
Registration No
CRM(A)/347/2026
Registration Date
12-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )
Sub-Category
Anticipatory Bail ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL SECTION
Decision Date
16-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PRADIP ROY ANIRBAN BANERJEE
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)View PDF
The Calcutta High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioner Pradip Roy in a case involving charges under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for alleged attempt to rape and related offenses. The court found that the FIR was filed with substantial delay (18 days after the alleged incident on 19.03.2026) and that the injury report showed the petitioner himself had been assaulted by the complainant's family members, warranting bail on a bond of Rs.5,000 with conditions prohibiting witness intimidation and requiring cooperation with the investigating officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Jun-2026
Application For Anticipatory Bail
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)
-
10-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRM(A)/347/2026
The Calcutta High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioner Pradip Roy in a case involving charges under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for alleged attempt to rape and related offenses. The court found that the FIR was filed with substantial delay (18 days after the alleged incident on 19.03.2026) and that the injury report showed the petitioner himself had been assaulted by the complainant's family members, warranting bail on a bond of Rs.5,000 with conditions prohibiting witness intimidation and requiring cooperation with the investigating officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts