MALA CHHETRI AND ANR MR RIMIK CHAKRABORTY vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL — CRM(A)/338/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 15th June 2026.
CNR: WBCHCJ0022222026
Filing Number
CRM(A)/350/2026
Filing Date
10-Jun-2026
Registration No
CRM(A)/338/2026
Registration Date
11-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )
Sub-Category
Anticipatory Bail ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL SECTION
Decision Date
15-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MALA CHHETRI AND ANR MR RIMIK CHAKRABORTY
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)View PDF
Case Summary: CRM(A) 338/2026 The High Court at Calcutta (Jalpaiguri Circuit Bench) granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Mala Chhetri and Md. Jahid in a land fraud case involving allegations of illegal property transfer through fake documents. The court found sufficient grounds for bail based on case materials, noting that while a related civil suit challenging the deed transfer is pending, the petitioners were not parties to it and evidence of impersonation by a third party (Simran Rai) was identified. Bail was granted on Rs. 10,000 bond each with local sureties, conditional on cooperation with investigation and non-intimidation of witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Jun-2026
Application For Anticipatory Bail
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)
-
10-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRM(A)/338/2026
Case Summary: CRM(A) 338/2026 The High Court at Calcutta (Jalpaiguri Circuit Bench) granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Mala Chhetri and Md. Jahid in a land fraud case involving allegations of illegal property transfer through fake documents. The court found sufficient grounds for bail based on case materials, noting that while a related civil suit challenging the deed transfer is pending, the petitioners were not parties to it and evidence of impersonation by a third party (Simran Rai) was identified. Bail was granted on Rs. 10,000 bond each with local sureties, conditional on cooperation with investigation and non-intimidation of witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts