NIM BAHADUR TAMANAG ANIRBAN CHAKRABORTY vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS — WPA/832/2026
Case under West Bengal Board of Primary Education Act ,1973 Section N/A. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 15th June 2026.
CNR: WBCHCJ0022112026
Filing Number
WPA/867/2026
Filing Date
10-Jun-2026
Registration No
WPA/832/2026
Registration Date
11-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Primary Education Post Retirement ( 39 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
15-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NIM BAHADUR TAMANAG ANIRBAN CHAKRABORTY
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Justice Bivas PattanayakView PDF
Case Summary: WPA/832/2026 The High Court at Calcutta (Jalpaiguri Bench) partially allowed the writ petition of Nim Bahadur Tamanag, a retired Head Teacher. The petitioner sought 18% interest on delayed gratuity and arrear pension payments from his retirement on May 31, 2020 until actual disbursement on December 12, 2020. The court found considerable delay in payment and ruled that the State has a duty to disburse pensionary benefits promptly, entitling employees to interest on delayed amounts. However, the court reduced the interest rate to 8% per annum instead of the requested 18%, directing payment within six weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Jun-2026
Interest On Gratuity
Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak
-
10-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPA/832/2026
Case Summary: WPA/832/2026 The High Court at Calcutta (Jalpaiguri Bench) partially allowed the writ petition of Nim Bahadur Tamanag, a retired Head Teacher. The petitioner sought 18% interest on delayed gratuity and arrear pension payments from his retirement on May 31, 2020 until actual disbursement on December 12, 2020. The court found considerable delay in payment and ruled that the State has a duty to disburse pensionary benefits promptly, entitling employees to interest on delayed amounts. However, the court reduced the interest rate to 8% per annum instead of the requested 18%, directing payment within six weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts