PUSHAMATI CHIK BARAIK AMRITA MAJI vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS — WPA/828/2026

Case under West Bengal Board of Primary Education Act ,1973 Section N/A. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 15-Jun-2026

CNR: WBCHCJ0022062026

Filing Number

WPA/864/2026

Filing Date

10-Jun-2026

Registration No

WPA/828/2026

Registration Date

11-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Primary Education Post Retirement ( 39 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

West Bengal Board of Primary Education Act ,1973 Section N/A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PUSHAMATI CHIK BARAIK AMRITA MAJI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Bivas PattanayakView PDF

    Summary of WPA/828/2026 (Pushamati Chik Baraik v. The State of West Bengal) The petitioner sought interest at 18% per annum on delayed gratuity and arrear pension payments following her husband's death in January 2024, though the pension order was issued only in June 2025 and payments disbursed in July 2025. The court found considerable delay in disbursement and held that the State has a duty to pay pensionary benefits promptly, with interest payable on delayed amounts. The court directed the Director of Pension and Treasury Officer to disburse interest at 8% per annum (instead of the requested 18%) from the date following the employee's death until actual payment, within eight weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Interest On Gratuity

    Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak

  4. 10-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPA/828/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of WPA/828/2026 (Pushamati Chik Baraik v. The State of West Bengal) The petitioner sought interest at 18% per annum on delayed gratuity and arrear pension payments following her husband's death in January 2024, though the pension order was issued only in June 2025 and payments disbursed in July 2025. The court found considerable delay in disbursement and held that the State has a duty to pay pensionary benefits promptly, with interest payable on delayed amounts. The court directed the Director of Pension and Treasury Officer to disburse interest at 8% per annum (instead of the requested 18%) from the date following the employee's death until actual payment, within eight weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case