AJOY ROY ARNAB SAHA vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL — CRR/195/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Act ,1974 Section 482,397,401. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

Next hearing 16-Jun-2026

CNR: WBCHCJ0021902026

Filing Number

CRR/203/2026

Filing Date

10-Jun-2026

Registration No

CRR/195/2026

Registration Date

11-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )

Sub-Category

Exercise of inherent power u/s 482 Cr. P. C. ( 40 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL SECTION

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Act ,1974 Section 482,397,401

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AJOY ROY ARNAB SAHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Case History

  1. 16-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Criminal Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)

  3. 12-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)View PDF

    Case Summary: CRR 195/2026 Outcome: Case adjourned for hearing on 16 June 2026. Petitioner Ajoy Roy challenged a summons issued under Section 129 of BNSS, 2023 requiring him to appear before the Sub-Divisional Executive Magistrate at Dinhata on charges described as "undefined or unfurnished or incommunicado." The court deferred substantive hearing and directed the petitioner to serve the Additional Public Prosecutor, who must place necessary instructions before the court on the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 12-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRR/195/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRR 195/2026 Outcome: Case adjourned for hearing on 16 June 2026. Petitioner Ajoy Roy challenged a summons issued under Section 129 of BNSS, 2023 requiring him to appear before the Sub-Divisional Executive Magistrate at Dinhata on charges described as "undefined or unfurnished or incommunicado." The court deferred substantive hearing and directed the petitioner to serve the Additional Public Prosecutor, who must place necessary instructions before the court on the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case