SANAY DEY AND ANR SHUBHAM KUMAR vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL — CRM(A)/343/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 15-Jun-2026

CNR: WBCHCJ0021852026

Filing Number

CRM(A)/347/2026

Filing Date

10-Jun-2026

Registration No

CRM(A)/343/2026

Registration Date

11-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )

Sub-Category

Anticipatory Bail ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL SECTION

Decision Date

16-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANAY DEY AND ANR SHUBHAM KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)View PDF

    The High Court at Calcutta (Jalpaiguri Circuit Bench) granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Sanay Dey and Shubham Kumar in a dowry prohibition case, finding that the injury was allegedly caused by the complainant's husband (not the petitioners) and considering the family relationship between parties. The petitioners must furnish bonds of Rs. 5,000 each with sureties, cooperate with investigation, and refrain from witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    Application For Anticipatory Bail

    Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)

  4. 15-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 10-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM(A)/343/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court at Calcutta (Jalpaiguri Circuit Bench) granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Sanay Dey and Shubham Kumar in a dowry prohibition case, finding that the injury was allegedly caused by the complainant's husband (not the petitioners) and considering the family relationship between parties. The petitioners must furnish bonds of Rs. 5,000 each with sureties, cooperate with investigation, and refrain from witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case