FR.SEBASTIAN BASTEPPA MARTIS BIKASH SINGHA vs BEE GEE WOOD CRAFT UDYOG PRIVATE LIMITED AND ORS — CO/74/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Act ,1908 Section N/A. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 16th June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 11-Jun-2026

CNR: WBCHCJ0021722026

Filing Number

CO/76/2026

Filing Date

09-Jun-2026

Registration No

CO/74/2026

Registration Date

10-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 57 )

Judicial Branch

RULE SECTION

Decision Date

16-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Act ,1908 Section N/A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.FR.SEBASTIAN BASTEPPA MARTIS BIKASH SINGHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BEE GEE WOOD CRAFT UDYOG PRIVATE LIMITED AND ORS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi BhattacharyyaView PDF

    Case Summary: CO/74/2026 The Calcutta High Court allowed Fr. Sebastian Basteppa Martis's revisional petition in part, setting aside the trial judge's dismissal of an undervaluation objection. The court found that the trial judge failed to properly analyze whether the suit's principal relief was title declaration or eviction based on unauthorized possession. The court remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, directing the trial judge to examine the plaint comprehensively and determine if undervaluation exists, with authority to require corrected valuation/court fees or reject the plaint accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya

  4. 11-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi BhattacharyyaView PDF

  5. 11-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CO/74/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CO/74/2026 The Calcutta High Court allowed Fr. Sebastian Basteppa Martis's revisional petition in part, setting aside the trial judge's dismissal of an undervaluation objection. The court found that the trial judge failed to properly analyze whether the suit's principal relief was title declaration or eviction based on unauthorized possession. The court remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, directing the trial judge to examine the plaint comprehensively and determine if undervaluation exists, with authority to require corrected valuation/court fees or reject the plaint accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case