HAMIDUL MOHAMDAD@MOHAMMED TAIAB SAHADAT vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL — CRM(NDPS)/296/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 12th June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 11-Jun-2026

CNR: WBCHCJ0021632026

Filing Number

CRM(NDPS)/304/2026

Filing Date

09-Jun-2026

Registration No

CRM(NDPS)/296/2026

Registration Date

10-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )

Sub-Category

Bail/Cancellation of bail ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL SECTION

Decision Date

12-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HAMIDUL MOHAMDAD@MOHAMMED TAIAB SAHADAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Supratim BhattacharyaView PDF

    The High Court at Calcutta rejected Hamidul Mohamdad's bail application under Section 483 BNSS in an NDPS case. The petitioner argued no videography of the seizure was conducted, but the State produced a videography certificate. The court rejected this contention as unacceptable and dismissed the bail plea, citing the quantity of substance recovered and the gravity of the offense under Section 21(c) NDPS Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Jun-2026

    Application For Bail - 1

    Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya

  4. 11-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM(NDPS)/296/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court at Calcutta rejected Hamidul Mohamdad's bail application under Section 483 BNSS in an NDPS case. The petitioner argued no videography of the seizure was conducted, but the State produced a videography certificate. The court rejected this contention as unacceptable and dismissed the bail plea, citing the quantity of substance recovered and the gravity of the offense under Section 21(c) NDPS Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case