HAMIDUL MOHAMDAD@MOHAMMED TAIAB SAHADAT vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL — CRM(NDPS)/296/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 12th June 2026.
CNR: WBCHCJ0021632026
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
Filing Number
CRM(NDPS)/304/2026
Filing Date
09-06-2026
Registration No
CRM(NDPS)/296/2026
Registration Date
10-06-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE SUPRATIM BHATTACHARYA
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE SUPRATIM BHATTACHARYA
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )
Sub-Category
Bail/Cancellation of bail ( 11 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL SECTION
Decision Date
12th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HAMIDUL MOHAMDAD@MOHAMMED TAIAB SAHADAT
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SUPRATIM BHATTACHARYA
APPLICATION FOR BAIL
APPLICATION FOR BAIL - 1
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-06-2026 | APPLICATION FOR BAIL |
| 12-06-2026 | APPLICATION FOR BAIL - 1 |
Orders
The High Court at Calcutta rejected Hamidul Mohamdad's bail application under Section 483 BNSS in an NDPS case. The petitioner argued no videography of the seizure was conducted, but the State produced a videography certificate. The court rejected this contention as unacceptable and dismissed the bail plea, citing the quantity of substance recovered and the gravity of the offense under Section 21(c) NDPS Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court at Calcutta rejected Hamidul Mohamdad's bail application under Section 483 BNSS in an NDPS case. The petitioner argued no videography of the seizure was conducted, but the State produced a videography certificate. The court rejected this contention as unacceptable and dismissed the bail plea, citing the quantity of substance recovered and the gravity of the offense under Section 21(c) NDPS Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts