BENOY DEWAN ANIRBAN CHAKRABORTY vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS — WPA/817/2026

Case under West Bengal Board of Secondary Education Act ,1963 Section N/A. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 12-Jun-2026

CNR: WBCHCJ0021592026

Filing Number

WPA/842/2026

Filing Date

09-Jun-2026

Registration No

WPA/817/2026

Registration Date

10-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Secondary Education Post Retirement ( 28 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

West Bengal Board of Secondary Education Act ,1963 Section N/A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BENOY DEWAN ANIRBAN CHAKRABORTY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Bivas PattanayakView PDF

    Summary: The High Court at Calcutta granted Benoy Dewan's writ petition against West Bengal, directing the state to pay 8% per annum interest on delayed gratuity and arrear pension. The petitioner, an Assistant Teacher who retired on 31 January 2025, received his pensionary benefits on 27 May 2025—over four months later—without interest compensation. The court found the delay constituted grounds for interest entitlement and ordered payment within six weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Jun-2026

    Interest On Gratuity

    Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak

  4. 09-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPA/817/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court at Calcutta granted Benoy Dewan's writ petition against West Bengal, directing the state to pay 8% per annum interest on delayed gratuity and arrear pension. The petitioner, an Assistant Teacher who retired on 31 January 2025, received his pensionary benefits on 27 May 2025—over four months later—without interest compensation. The court found the delay constituted grounds for interest entitlement and ordered payment within six weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case