PRANESH SARKAR AMRITA MAJI vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS — WPA/840/2026
Case under West Bengal Board of Secondary Education Act ,1963 Section N/A. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 15th June 2026.
CNR: WBCHCJ0021562026
Filing Number
WPA/839/2026
Filing Date
09-Jun-2026
Registration No
WPA/840/2026
Registration Date
11-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Secondary Education Post Retirement ( 28 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
15-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PRANESH SARKAR AMRITA MAJI
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Justice Bivas PattanayakView PDF
The High Court at Calcutta allowed Pranesh Sarkar's writ petition seeking interest on delayed gratuity and arrear pension payments following his wife's death in 2014. Though the petitioner sought 18% per annum, the court directed the State to disburse interest at 8% per annum from the date following the employee's death until actual payment (January 2020), within eight weeks, holding that delay in claiming relief cannot defeat valuable rights if third-party interests are unaffected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Jun-2026
Interest On Gratuity
Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak
-
09-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPA/840/2026
The High Court at Calcutta allowed Pranesh Sarkar's writ petition seeking interest on delayed gratuity and arrear pension payments following his wife's death in 2014. Though the petitioner sought 18% per annum, the court directed the State to disburse interest at 8% per annum from the date following the employee's death until actual payment (January 2020), within eight weeks, holding that delay in claiming relief cannot defeat valuable rights if third-party interests are unaffected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts