BIMAL CHANDRA ROY JONAKI SAHA vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS — WPA/824/2026
Case under West Bengal Panchayat Act ,1973 Section N/A. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 15th June 2026.
CNR: WBCHCJ0021552026
Filing Number
WPA/838/2026
Filing Date
09-Jun-2026
Registration No
WPA/824/2026
Registration Date
10-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 7 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
15-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BIMAL CHANDRA ROY JONAKI SAHA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Justice Bivas PattanayakView PDF
The High Court at Calcutta granted Bimal Chandra Roy's writ petition seeking interest on delayed payment of gratuity and arrear pension. The petitioner retired on September 30, 2016, but received his pensionary benefits only on May 6, 2017—a seven-month delay. The court directed the Director of Pension and Treasury Officer, Jalpaiguri to disburse 8% per annum interest (from retirement date to payment date) within six weeks, rejecting the petitioner's demand for 18% but recognizing his entitlement to compensation for the delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Jun-2026
Interest On Gratuity
Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak
-
09-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPA/824/2026
The High Court at Calcutta granted Bimal Chandra Roy's writ petition seeking interest on delayed payment of gratuity and arrear pension. The petitioner retired on September 30, 2016, but received his pensionary benefits only on May 6, 2017—a seven-month delay. The court directed the Director of Pension and Treasury Officer, Jalpaiguri to disburse 8% per annum interest (from retirement date to payment date) within six weeks, rejecting the petitioner's demand for 18% but recognizing his entitlement to compensation for the delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts