RAVI ROY@RABI ROY MISS PUJA ROY vs THE STATE OFWEST BENGAL — CRM(A)/333/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 12th June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 12-Jun-2026

CNR: WBCHCJ0021472026

Filing Number

CRM(A)/344/2026

Filing Date

09-Jun-2026

Registration No

CRM(A)/333/2026

Registration Date

10-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )

Sub-Category

Anticipatory Bail ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL SECTION

Decision Date

12-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAVI ROY@RABI ROY MISS PUJA ROY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OFWEST BENGAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)View PDF

    Case Summary: CRM(A) 333/2026 The Calcutta High Court at Jalpaiguri rejected Ravi Roy's anticipatory bail application in connection with Siliguri Police Station Case No. 657 of 2025 involving charges under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The court found the case unsuitable for anticipatory bail based on the serious nature of injury—a stab wound to the victim's right upper chest wall as documented in the government hospital injury report—and the materials on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Jun-2026

    Application For Anticipatory Bail

    Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)

  4. 09-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM(A)/333/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM(A) 333/2026 The Calcutta High Court at Jalpaiguri rejected Ravi Roy's anticipatory bail application in connection with Siliguri Police Station Case No. 657 of 2025 involving charges under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The court found the case unsuitable for anticipatory bail based on the serious nature of injury—a stab wound to the victim's right upper chest wall as documented in the government hospital injury report—and the materials on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case