SURESH ROY MISS RIMA SARKAR vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR — CRA(DB)/34/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415(2). Next hearing: : -.
CNR: WBCHCJ0021332026
Filing Number
CRA(DB)/35/2026
Filing Date
08-Jun-2026
Registration No
CRA(DB)/34/2026
Registration Date
09-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )
Sub-Category
Convition: Sentence/imprisonment/imprisonment & fine/probation/admonition ( 23 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL SECTION
Last updated 13-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SURESH ROY MISS RIMA SARKAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
12-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya,hon'ble Justice Supratim BhattacharyaView PDF
-
12-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya,hon'ble Justice Supratim BhattacharyaView PDF
Case Summary: CRA(DB) 34/2026 The Calcutta High Court's Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri allowed the condonation application (CRAN 1 of 2026) and admitted the appeal filed by Suresh Roy against The State of West Bengal. The court accepted the appellant's explanation for delayed filing, citing custody and financial hardship, and proceeded to admit the main appeal on its merits. The fine component of the impugned judgment was stayed pending appeal disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Jun-2026
For Admission
Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya
-
08-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRA(DB)/34/2026
Case Summary: CRA(DB) 34/2026 The Calcutta High Court's Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri allowed the condonation application (CRAN 1 of 2026) and admitted the appeal filed by Suresh Roy against The State of West Bengal. The court accepted the appellant's explanation for delayed filing, citing custody and financial hardship, and proceeded to admit the main appeal on its merits. The fine component of the impugned judgment was stayed pending appeal disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts