SURESH ROY MISS RIMA SARKAR vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR — CRA(DB)/34/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415(2). Next hearing: : -.

CNR: WBCHCJ0021332026

Next Hearing

: -

Filing Number

CRA(DB)/35/2026

Filing Date

08-06-2026

Registration No

CRA(DB)/34/2026

Registration Date

09-06-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA , HON'BLE JUSTICE SUPRATIM BHATTACHARYA

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA , HON'BLE JUSTICE SUPRATIM BHATTACHARYA

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )

Sub-Category

Convition: Sentence/imprisonment/imprisonment & fine/probation/admonition ( 23 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL SECTION

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415(2)
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act Section 6

Petitioner(s)

SURESH ROY MISS RIMA SARKAR

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA , HON'BLE JUSTICE SUPRATIM BHATTACHARYA

12-06-2026

FOR ADMISSION

Orders

12-06-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA,HON'BLE JUSTICE SUPRATIM BHATTACHARYA

Case Summary: CRA(DB) 34/2026 The Calcutta High Court's Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri allowed the condonation application (CRAN 1 of 2026) and admitted the appeal filed by Suresh Roy against The State of West Bengal. The court accepted the appellant's explanation for delayed filing, citing custody and financial hardship, and proceeded to admit the main appeal on its merits. The fine component of the impugned judgment was stayed pending appeal disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRA(DB) 34/2026 The Calcutta High Court's Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri allowed the condonation application (CRAN 1 of 2026) and admitted the appeal filed by Suresh Roy against The State of West Bengal. The court accepted the appellant's explanation for delayed filing, citing custody and financial hardship, and proceeded to admit the main appeal on its merits. The fine component of the impugned judgment was stayed pending appeal disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case