C T RAGHUNANDAN@RAGHUNANDAN DIPTANGSHU BASU vs State of West Bengal — CRA /22/2021

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure ,1973 Section 374(2). Next hearing: 16th April 2026.

CNR: WBCHCJ0021282021

Next Hearing

16th April 2026

Filing Number

CRA /22/2021

Filing Date

24-06-2021

Registration No

CRA /22/2021

Registration Date

24-06-2021

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD , HON'BLE JUSTICE PRASENJIT BISWAS

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD , HON'BLE JUSTICE PRASENJIT BISWAS

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )

Sub-Category

Convition: Sentence/imprisonment/imprisonment & fine/probation/admonition ( 23 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL SECTION

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure ,1973 Section 374(2)
Indian Penal Code Act ,1860 Section 302/201

Petitioner(s)

C T RAGHUNANDAN@RAGHUNANDAN DIPTANGSHU BASU

Respondent(s)

State of West Bengal

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD , HON'BLE JUSTICE PRASENJIT BISWAS

28-06-2021

FOR ADMISSION

16-04-2026

CRIMINAL APPEAL HEARING

13-04-2026

CRIMINAL APPEAL HEARING

10-04-2026

CRIMINAL APPEAL HEARING

09-04-2026

CRIMINAL APPEAL HEARING

Orders

25-03-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK,HON'BLE JUSTICE BISWAROOP CHOWDHURY

Summary: The appeal (CRA/22/2021) by C T Raghunandan against the State of West Bengal was adjourned and listed before the next available Circuit Bench of Calcutta High Court. The court noted a disagreement between the appellant's private counsel and legal aid advocate regarding the appeal arguments. A typographical error in a prior order dated March 20, 2026 was also corrected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The appeal (CRA/22/2021) by C T Raghunandan against the State of West Bengal was adjourned and listed before the next available Circuit Bench of Calcutta High Court. The court noted a disagreement between the appellant's private counsel and legal aid advocate regarding the appeal arguments. A typographical error in a prior order dated March 20, 2026 was also corrected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case