HAIMANTI ROY ROUNAK GHOSH vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL — CRM(A)/326/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th June 2026.
CNR: WBCHCJ0021272026
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
Filing Number
CRM(A)/341/2026
Filing Date
08-06-2026
Registration No
CRM(A)/326/2026
Registration Date
09-06-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL)
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL)
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )
Sub-Category
Anticipatory Bail ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL SECTION
Decision Date
11th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HAIMANTI ROY ROUNAK GHOSH
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL)
APPLICATION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL
APPLICATION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-06-2026 | APPLICATION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL |
| 11-06-2026 | APPLICATION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL |
Orders
The Calcutta High Court granted anticipatory bail to Haimanti Roy, wife of a deceased husband who died by suicide, despite allegations of constant mental and physical torture. The court considered the prima facie case materials regarding the matrimonial dispute but was swayed by the petitioner's young child (2-3 months old) and circumstances. Roy was granted bail on furnishing Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties of Rs. 5,000 each, subject to cooperating with investigation and not intimidating witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Calcutta High Court granted anticipatory bail to Haimanti Roy, wife of a deceased husband who died by suicide, despite allegations of constant mental and physical torture. The court considered the prima facie case materials regarding the matrimonial dispute but was swayed by the petitioner's young child (2-3 months old) and circumstances. Roy was granted bail on furnishing Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties of Rs. 5,000 each, subject to cooperating with investigation and not intimidating witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts