LIPI ROY AND ANR. SUKANYA ADHIKARY vs SANTOSH SINGHA ROY @ SANTOSH ROY — CRA(DB)/21/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 378. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: WBCHCJ0021202025
Next Hearing
: -
Filing Number
CRA(DB) /21/2025
Filing Date
23-04-2025
Registration No
CRA(DB) /21/2025
Registration Date
23-04-2025
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK , HON'BLE JUSTICE BISWAROOP CHOWDHURY
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK , HON'BLE JUSTICE BISWAROOP CHOWDHURY
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )
Sub-Category
Convition: Sentence/imprisonment/imprisonment & fine/probation/admonition ( 23 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL SECTION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
LIPI ROY AND ANR. SUKANYA ADHIKARY
Respondent(s)
SANTOSH SINGHA ROY @ SANTOSH ROY
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK , HON'BLE JUSTICE BISWAROOP CHOWDHURY
FOR ADMISSION
APPEAL AGAINST ACQUITTAL
APPEAL AGAINST ACQUITTAL
APPEAL AGAINST ACQUITTAL
APPEAL AGAINST ACQUITTAL
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 25-04-2025 | FOR ADMISSION | |
| 23-03-2026 | APPEAL AGAINST ACQUITTAL | |
| 20-03-2026 | APPEAL AGAINST ACQUITTAL | |
| 19-03-2026 | APPEAL AGAINST ACQUITTAL | |
| 18-03-2026 | APPEAL AGAINST ACQUITTAL |
Orders
Summary: The Calcutta High Court's Appellate Bench admitted a criminal appeal against an acquittal judgment dated January 17, 2025. The Court directed respondents 1-7 to obtain bail from the jurisdictional court within four weeks, with the jurisdictional court empowered to take enforcement action in case of non-compliance. The appeal was adjourned for four weeks, and procedural amendments were ordered including redaction of the victim's name and transposition of appellant no. 2 as respondent no. 8. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Calcutta High Court's Appellate Bench admitted a criminal appeal against an acquittal judgment dated January 17, 2025. The Court directed respondents 1-7 to obtain bail from the jurisdictional court within four weeks, with the jurisdictional court empowered to take enforcement action in case of non-compliance. The appeal was adjourned for four weeks, and procedural amendments were ordered including redaction of the victim's name and transposition of appellant no. 2 as respondent no. 8. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts