MD MOSTAKUR@GUDDU@MD MUSTAQUIM HILLOL SAHA PODDER vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL — CRR/190/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 528. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
CNR: WBCHCJ0021092026
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
Filing Number
CRR/195/2026
Filing Date
08-06-2026
Registration No
CRR/190/2026
Registration Date
09-06-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL)
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL)
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )
Sub-Category
Quashing of Proceedings ( 75 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL SECTION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MD MOSTAKUR@GUDDU@MD MUSTAQUIM HILLOL SAHA PODDER
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL)
CRIMINAL REVISION
CRIMINAL MOTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-06-2026 | CRIMINAL REVISION |
| 17-06-2026 | CRIMINAL MOTION |
Orders
Case Summary: CRR 190/2026 The High Court at Calcutta (Jalpaiguri Bench) heard a revisional petition seeking to quash NDPS proceedings against Md. Mostakur for alleged violations under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The petitioner had previously been granted bail on grounds that arrest was based solely on a co-accused's statement and he was not arrested at the occurrence site. The court found a prima facie case and adjourned the matter to 17.06.2026 for full hearing, directing the petitioner to serve the State and both parties to file supporting documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CRR 190/2026 The High Court at Calcutta (Jalpaiguri Bench) heard a revisional petition seeking to quash NDPS proceedings against Md. Mostakur for alleged violations under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The petitioner had previously been granted bail on grounds that arrest was based solely on a co-accused's statement and he was not arrested at the occurrence site. The court found a prima facie case and adjourned the matter to 17.06.2026 for full hearing, directing the petitioner to serve the State and both parties to file supporting documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts