BIMAL ROY ABHISHEK SARKAR vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR — CRA(DB)/35/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415(2). Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

Next hearing 18-Jun-2026

CNR: WBCHCJ0021062026

Filing Number

CRA(DB)/34/2026

Filing Date

08-Jun-2026

Registration No

CRA(DB)/35/2026

Registration Date

10-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )

Sub-Category

Convition: Sentence/imprisonment/imprisonment & fine/probation/admonition ( 23 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL SECTION

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415(2)
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Act ,1974 Section 374(2)
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act Section 6

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BIMAL ROY ABHISHEK SARKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

Case History

  1. 18-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Admission Of Criminal Appeal

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya

  3. 12-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya,hon'ble Justice Supratim BhattacharyaView PDF

    Case Summary: CRA(DB)/35/2026 Outcome: The case was adjourned to June 18, 2026, on the appellant's prayer. The court permitted the department to open the sealed envelope containing the impugned judgment solely for calculating the limitation period, after which it must be re-sealed, pending further court orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 12-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 08-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRA(DB)/35/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRA(DB)/35/2026 Outcome: The case was adjourned to June 18, 2026, on the appellant's prayer. The court permitted the department to open the sealed envelope containing the impugned judgment solely for calculating the limitation period, after which it must be re-sealed, pending further court orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case