M/S. ABC CIVIL ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANCY MD.AHIYA vs SUBRATA PANDIT — AO-COM/1/2026

Case under Commercial Courts Act 2015 Section NA. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: WBCHCJ0020792026

Filing Number

AO-COM/1/2026

Filing Date

22-May-2026

Registration No

AO-COM/1/2026

Registration Date

08-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 57 )

Judicial Branch

STAMP REPORTER (SR) SECTION

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Commercial Courts Act 2015 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S. ABC CIVIL ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANCY MD.AHIYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUBRATA PANDIT

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya,hon'ble Justice Supratim BhattacharyaView PDF

    SUMMARY: The Calcutta High Court's Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri admitted the appeal filed by M/s. ABC Civil Engineering and Architectural Consultancy against Smt. Subrata Pandit, finding questions of both fact and law involved. The appellant was directed to pay postal costs and serve notice within two weeks, file informal paper books with necessary documents within six weeks, and parties were granted liberty to seek inclusion in the hearing list once ready. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya

  4. 22-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. AO-COM/1/2026

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The Calcutta High Court's Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri admitted the appeal filed by M/s. ABC Civil Engineering and Architectural Consultancy against Smt. Subrata Pandit, finding questions of both fact and law involved. The appellant was directed to pay postal costs and serve notice within two weeks, file informal paper books with necessary documents within six weeks, and parties were granted liberty to seek inclusion in the hearing list once ready. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case