UNION OF INDIA AJOY KUMAR SINGHANIA vs TERAI TEA COMPANY LTD AND ANR — FMAT(ARBAWARD)/1/2026

Case under Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act ,1952 Section 11. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: WBCHCJ0020782026

Filing Number

FMAT(ARBAWARD)/1/2026

Filing Date

22-May-2026

Registration No

FMAT(ARBAWARD)/1/2026

Registration Date

05-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Sub-Category

Arbitration ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

STAMP REPORTER (SR) SECTION

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act ,1952 Section 11

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA AJOY KUMAR SINGHANIA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.TERAI TEA COMPANY LTD AND ANR

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya,hon'ble Justice Supratim BhattacharyaView PDF

    FMAT(ARBAWARD) /1/2026 Summary: The Calcutta High Court's Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri admitted Union of India's arbitration appeal against Terai Tea Company Ltd., finding questions of both fact and law involved. The court directed the appellant to serve notice within a fortnight, collect arbitration records within eight weeks to prepare paper books, and granted liberty to mention the appeal for hearing once ready. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    Arbitration

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya

  4. 22-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. FMAT(ARBAWARD)/1/2026

casestatus.in Summary

FMAT(ARBAWARD) /1/2026 Summary: The Calcutta High Court's Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri admitted Union of India's arbitration appeal against Terai Tea Company Ltd., finding questions of both fact and law involved. The court directed the appellant to serve notice within a fortnight, collect arbitration records within eight weeks to prepare paper books, and granted liberty to mention the appeal for hearing once ready. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case