LITON ROY ANKUR BARMAN vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR — CRM(M)/149/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 18th June 2026.
CNR: WBCHCJ0020762026
Filing Number
CRM(M)/151/2026
Filing Date
22-May-2026
Registration No
CRM(M)/149/2026
Registration Date
08-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )
Sub-Category
Bail/Cancellation of bail ( 11 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL SECTION
Decision Date
18-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.LITON ROY ANKUR BARMAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Justice Supratim BhattacharyaView PDF
The High Court at Calcutta rejected Liton Roy's bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in a case involving sexual assault charges under Sections 3(5)/329(4)/351(3)/64. The court found that victim statements and witness accounts corroborated the FIR allegations that the offence occurred under pretext of a promise to marry, and determined bail was not warranted given these circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Jun-2026
Application For Bail
Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya
-
17-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Justice Supratim BhattacharyaView PDF
-
17-Jun-2026
Application For Bail
Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya
-
16-Jun-2026
Application For Bail
Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya
-
15-Jun-2026
Application For Bail
Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya
-
12-Jun-2026
Application For Bail
Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya
-
11-Jun-2026
Application For Bail
Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya
-
10-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRM(M)/149/2026
The High Court at Calcutta rejected Liton Roy's bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in a case involving sexual assault charges under Sections 3(5)/329(4)/351(3)/64. The court found that victim statements and witness accounts corroborated the FIR allegations that the offence occurred under pretext of a promise to marry, and determined bail was not warranted given these circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts