SANTOSH KUMAR SAH KHUSHI KUNDU vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS — MAT/51/2026
Case under Cgst Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 18th June 2026.
CNR: WBCHCJ0020702026
Filing Number
MAT/52/2026
Filing Date
21-May-2026
Registration No
MAT/51/2026
Registration Date
22-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 7 )
Judicial Branch
STAMP REPORTER (SR) SECTION
Decision Date
18-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SANTOSH KUMAR SAH KHUSHI KUNDU
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya,hon'ble Justice Supratim BhattacharyaView PDF
-
18-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya,hon'ble Justice Supratim BhattacharyaView PDF
The Calcutta High Court (Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri) dismissed MAT 51/2026 and CAN 1/2026 as withdrawn on the appellant's instruction. The court permitted the appellant to pursue alternative legal remedies available in law, with no order regarding costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Jun-2026
To Be Mentioned
Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya
-
17-Jun-2026
Mandamus Application
Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya
-
16-Jun-2026
Mandamus Application
Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya
-
15-Jun-2026
Mandamus Application
Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya
-
10-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. MAT/51/2026
The Calcutta High Court (Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri) dismissed MAT 51/2026 and CAN 1/2026 as withdrawn on the appellant's instruction. The court permitted the appellant to pursue alternative legal remedies available in law, with no order regarding costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts