DAYAL BARMAN @ NIMAI BARMAN AND ORS SUDIP GUHA vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR — CRM(A)/340/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 15th June 2026.
CNR: WBCHCJ0020492026
Filing Number
CRM(A)/323/2026
Filing Date
21-May-2026
Registration No
CRM(A)/340/2026
Registration Date
11-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )
Sub-Category
Anticipatory Bail ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL SECTION
Decision Date
15-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DAYAL BARMAN @ NIMAI BARMAN AND ORS SUDIP GUHA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)View PDF
The High Court at Calcutta (Jalpaiguri Circuit Bench) rejected the petitioners' application for anticipatory bail in a case involving charges under sections related to child sexual abuse and child marriage. The court found the victim was approximately 15 years old, and based on the victim's statement recorded under Section 164 CrPC, determined the case unsuitable for anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Jun-2026
Application For Anticipatory Bail
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)
-
21-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRM(A)/340/2026
The High Court at Calcutta (Jalpaiguri Circuit Bench) rejected the petitioners' application for anticipatory bail in a case involving charges under sections related to child sexual abuse and child marriage. The court found the victim was approximately 15 years old, and based on the victim's statement recorded under Section 164 CrPC, determined the case unsuitable for anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts