NISHI SARKAR @ NISHIK SAKAR AND ORS SUDIP GUHA vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL — CRM(A)/336/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 15-Jun-2026

CNR: WBCHCJ0020482026

Filing Number

CRM(A)/322/2026

Filing Date

21-May-2026

Registration No

CRM(A)/336/2026

Registration Date

10-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )

Sub-Category

Anticipatory Bail ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL SECTION

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NISHI SARKAR @ NISHIK SAKAR AND ORS SUDIP GUHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)View PDF

    Case Summary: CRM(A) 336/2026 The High Court at Calcutta (Jalpaiguri Bench) partially granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Nishi Sarkar and Kalyan Sarkar in an assault case, but rejected bail for Goutam Sarkar. The court distinguished between the accused based on specificity of allegations: only Goutam Sarkar was specifically alleged to have wielded a "Dao" (sharp weapon) that caused the victim's grievous scalp injury, while petitioners 1 and 3 faced only general assault allegations without weapon involvement. Bail petitioners 1 and 3 were released on Rs. 10,000 bonds with conditions to cooperate with investigation and not intimidate witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Application For Anticipatory Bail

    Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)

  4. 21-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM(A)/336/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM(A) 336/2026 The High Court at Calcutta (Jalpaiguri Bench) partially granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Nishi Sarkar and Kalyan Sarkar in an assault case, but rejected bail for Goutam Sarkar. The court distinguished between the accused based on specificity of allegations: only Goutam Sarkar was specifically alleged to have wielded a "Dao" (sharp weapon) that caused the victim's grievous scalp injury, while petitioners 1 and 3 faced only general assault allegations without weapon involvement. Bail petitioners 1 and 3 were released on Rs. 10,000 bonds with conditions to cooperate with investigation and not intimidate witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case