FARIDA KHATUN MR.SOURAV LOHANI vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL — CRM(NDPS)/283/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 11th June 2026.
CNR: WBCHCJ0020372026
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
Filing Number
CRM(NDPS)/289/2026
Filing Date
20-05-2026
Registration No
CRM(NDPS)/283/2026
Registration Date
21-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE SUPRATIM BHATTACHARYA
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE SUPRATIM BHATTACHARYA
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )
Sub-Category
Bail/Cancellation of bail ( 11 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL SECTION
Decision Date
11th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
FARIDA KHATUN MR.SOURAV LOHANI
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SUPRATIM BHATTACHARYA
APPLICATION FOR BAIL
APPLICATION FOR BAIL - 1
APPLICATION FOR BAIL - 1
APPLICATION FOR BAIL - 1
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-06-2026 | APPLICATION FOR BAIL |
| 11-06-2026 | APPLICATION FOR BAIL - 1 |
| 10-06-2026 | APPLICATION FOR BAIL - 1 |
| 09-06-2026 | APPLICATION FOR BAIL - 1 |
Orders
Case Summary: CRM(NDPS) 283/2026 The High Court at Calcutta rejected Farida Khatun's bail application in an NDPS case involving methamphetamine seizure. The court held that procedural non-compliance with Section 52A(2) does not mandate bail, absence of videography was justified to maintain privacy since substances were recovered from the accused's clothing, and the similarity between methamphetamine and amphetamine did not aid the petitioner's case. Given the substance quantity and offense gravity, bail was denied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CRM(NDPS) 283/2026 The High Court at Calcutta rejected Farida Khatun's bail application in an NDPS case involving methamphetamine seizure. The court held that procedural non-compliance with Section 52A(2) does not mandate bail, absence of videography was justified to maintain privacy since substances were recovered from the accused's clothing, and the similarity between methamphetamine and amphetamine did not aid the petitioner's case. Given the substance quantity and offense gravity, bail was denied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts