MAKSEDUL HOQUE@MACHIDUL HOQUE SAYANTAN BHOWMIK vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL — CRM(A)/311/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 09th June 2026.
CNR: WBCHCJ0020342026
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
Filing Number
CRM(A)/318/2026
Filing Date
20-05-2026
Registration No
CRM(A)/311/2026
Registration Date
21-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL)
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL)
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )
Sub-Category
Anticipatory Bail ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL SECTION
Decision Date
09th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MAKSEDUL HOQUE@MACHIDUL HOQUE SAYANTAN BHOWMIK
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL)
APPLICATION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-06-2026 | APPLICATION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL |
Orders
The Calcutta High Court at Jalpaiguri rejected petitioner Maksedul Hoque's application for anticipatory bail in connection with Pundibari Police Station Case No. 95 of 2026, involving charges under Sections 85/80/103 of the BNS Act read with Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. The court found the case unsuitable for anticipatory bail based on the nature of the alleged offences and materials on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Calcutta High Court at Jalpaiguri rejected petitioner Maksedul Hoque's application for anticipatory bail in connection with Pundibari Police Station Case No. 95 of 2026, involving charges under Sections 85/80/103 of the BNS Act read with Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. The court found the case unsuitable for anticipatory bail based on the nature of the alleged offences and materials on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts