DIPANKAR BAGCHI RIYA AGARWALA vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS — CRR/180/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 528. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 15th June 2026.
CNR: WBCHCJ0020292026
Filing Number
CRR/186/2026
Filing Date
19-May-2026
Registration No
CRR/180/2026
Registration Date
20-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )
Sub-Category
Exercise of inherent power u/s 482 Cr. P. C. ( 40 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL SECTION
Decision Date
15-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DIPANKAR BAGCHI RIYA AGARWALA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)View PDF
Summary: The High Court at Calcutta (Circuit Bench, Jalpaiguri) allowed petitioner Dipankar Bagchi's criminal revision and set aside the trial court's orders dated 20.02.2026 and 09.06.2026 that had rejected his Section 175(3) BNSS application for default non-appearance. The court restored the application to the trial court file and directed a fresh hearing on 01.07.2026, giving the petitioner an opportunity to be heard before the trial court proceeds further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Jun-2026
Criminal Motion
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)
-
08-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)View PDF
-
08-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRR/180/2026
Summary: The High Court at Calcutta (Circuit Bench, Jalpaiguri) allowed petitioner Dipankar Bagchi's criminal revision and set aside the trial court's orders dated 20.02.2026 and 09.06.2026 that had rejected his Section 175(3) BNSS application for default non-appearance. The court restored the application to the trial court file and directed a fresh hearing on 01.07.2026, giving the petitioner an opportunity to be heard before the trial court proceeds further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts