RAJ KUMAR SHA SHANKAR SARKAR vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL — CRM(NDPS)/280/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

Next hearing 16-Jun-2026

CNR: WBCHCJ0020282026

Filing Number

CRM(NDPS)/287/2026

Filing Date

19-May-2026

Registration No

CRM(NDPS)/280/2026

Registration Date

20-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )

Sub-Category

Bail/Cancellation of bail ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL SECTION

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJ KUMAR SHA SHANKAR SARKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Case History

  1. 16-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Application For Bail - 1

    Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Supratim BhattacharyaView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM(NDPS) 280/2026 The bail application of Raj Kumar Sha under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (NDPS matter) was adjourned to 16th June, 2026 on consent of both petitioner and State counsel. The petitioner's counsel, appearing virtually, requested the adjournment to enable physical representation before the High Court at Calcutta's Circuit Bench, Jalpaiguri. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 10-Jun-2026

    Application For Bail - 1

    Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya

  5. 09-Jun-2026

    Application For Bail - 1

    Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya

  6. 21-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 19-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM(NDPS)/280/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM(NDPS) 280/2026 The bail application of Raj Kumar Sha under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (NDPS matter) was adjourned to 16th June, 2026 on consent of both petitioner and State counsel. The petitioner's counsel, appearing virtually, requested the adjournment to enable physical representation before the High Court at Calcutta's Circuit Bench, Jalpaiguri. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case