LAKSHMI SARKAR AND ANR SANDIP GUHA ROY vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL — CRM(A)/304/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita,2023 Section 482. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 09th June 2026.
CNR: WBCHCJ0020072026
Filing Number
CRM(A)/309/2026
Filing Date
19-May-2026
Registration No
CRM(A)/304/2026
Registration Date
20-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )
Sub-Category
Anticipatory Bail ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL SECTION
Decision Date
09-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.LAKSHMI SARKAR AND ANR SANDIP GUHA ROY
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)View PDF
The High Court at Calcutta granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Lakshmi Sarkar and Anr. in a case involving charges under Sections 126(2)/74/117(2)/109/3(5), finding a prima facie free fight between parties based on the nature of injuries documented in medical records. The petitioners were ordered to furnish bonds of Rs. 5,000 each with two sureties, cooperate with investigation, and refrain from intimidating witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Jun-2026
Application For Anticipatory Bail
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)
-
08-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)View PDF
-
08-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRM(A)/304/2026
The High Court at Calcutta granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Lakshmi Sarkar and Anr. in a case involving charges under Sections 126(2)/74/117(2)/109/3(5), finding a prima facie free fight between parties based on the nature of injuries documented in medical records. The petitioners were ordered to furnish bonds of Rs. 5,000 each with two sureties, cooperate with investigation, and refrain from intimidating witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts