SARALA DEY SATYAM SARKAR vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS — WPA/779/2026

Case under No Act Section N/A. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

Next hearing 15-Jun-2026

CNR: WBCHCJ0019972026

Filing Number

WPA/801/2026

Filing Date

18-May-2026

Registration No

WPA/779/2026

Registration Date

19-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 6 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

No Act Section N/A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SARALA DEY SATYAM SARKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS

Case History

  1. 15-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak

  3. 12-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Bivas PattanayakView PDF

    Case Summary: WPA 779/2026 Sarala Dey sought directions to compel authorities to process her representation for family pension as the legally wedded wife of deceased West Bengal Police constable Manindra Chandra Dey. However, a second wife (Respondent No.7) had her name incorporated in service records, threatening pension denial to the petitioner. The court adjourned the matter to June 15, 2026, with the State seeking time for proper instructions and the Accountant General arguing the matter should be entertained by the State Administrative Tribunal instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 21-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 18-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPA/779/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPA 779/2026 Sarala Dey sought directions to compel authorities to process her representation for family pension as the legally wedded wife of deceased West Bengal Police constable Manindra Chandra Dey. However, a second wife (Respondent No.7) had her name incorporated in service records, threatening pension denial to the petitioner. The court adjourned the matter to June 15, 2026, with the State seeking time for proper instructions and the Accountant General arguing the matter should be entertained by the State Administrative Tribunal instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case