ANARUL HAQUE@JALAM TANIYA BHOWMIK vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL — CRM(A)/300/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 09th June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 20-May-2026

CNR: WBCHCJ0019502026

Filing Number

CRM(A)/299/2026

Filing Date

14-May-2026

Registration No

CRM(A)/300/2026

Registration Date

18-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )

Sub-Category

Anticipatory Bail ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL SECTION

Decision Date

09-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANARUL HAQUE@JALAM TANIYA BHOWMIK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)View PDF

    The High Court at Calcutta rejected petitioner Anarul Haque's second anticipatory bail application, finding insufficient evidence linking him to the drug case. The court noted that while the earlier rejection cited phone call records with the principal accused, the charge sheet contained no Call Detail Records to substantiate this claim, and the petitioner's implication rested solely on the principal accused's statement. The court granted liberty to surrender before the trial court and seek regular bail, which shall be considered in light of these observations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    Application For Anticipatory Bail

    Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)

  4. 08-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)View PDF

  5. 20-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 14-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM(A)/300/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court at Calcutta rejected petitioner Anarul Haque's second anticipatory bail application, finding insufficient evidence linking him to the drug case. The court noted that while the earlier rejection cited phone call records with the principal accused, the charge sheet contained no Call Detail Records to substantiate this claim, and the petitioner's implication rested solely on the principal accused's statement. The court granted liberty to surrender before the trial court and seek regular bail, which shall be considered in light of these observations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case