RASIK RAHAMAN AMIT SINHA vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL — CRM(NDPS)/274/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 11th June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 20-May-2026

CNR: WBCHCJ0019032026

Filing Number

CRM(NDPS)/271/2026

Filing Date

12-May-2026

Registration No

CRM(NDPS)/274/2026

Registration Date

18-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )

Sub-Category

Bail/Cancellation of bail ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL SECTION

Decision Date

11-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RASIK RAHAMAN AMIT SINHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Supratim BhattacharyaView PDF

    The High Court at Calcutta rejected petitioner Rasik Rahaman's bail application under NDPS Act sections 20(b)(ii)(c)/29 in connection with a ganja seizure case. The court dismissed the petitioner's claim that arrest grounds were not communicated, finding that grounds were properly provided, and refused bail due to the commercial quantity of 99.950 kgs of ganja recovered from the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Jun-2026

    Application For Bail - 1

    Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya

  4. 10-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Supratim BhattacharyaView PDF

  5. 10-Jun-2026

    Application For Bail - 1

    Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya

  6. 09-Jun-2026

    Application For Bail - 1

    Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya

  7. 20-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 12-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM(NDPS)/274/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court at Calcutta rejected petitioner Rasik Rahaman's bail application under NDPS Act sections 20(b)(ii)(c)/29 in connection with a ganja seizure case. The court dismissed the petitioner's claim that arrest grounds were not communicated, finding that grounds were properly provided, and refused bail due to the commercial quantity of 99.950 kgs of ganja recovered from the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case