NAZRUL ISLAM@NAJRUL ISLAM PRASANTA SARKAR vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR — CRM(M)/132/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

Next hearing 17-Jun-2026

CNR: WBCHCJ0018782026

Filing Number

CRM(M)/134/2026

Filing Date

11-May-2026

Registration No

CRM(M)/132/2026

Registration Date

14-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )

Sub-Category

Bail/Cancellation of bail ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL SECTION

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NAZRUL ISLAM@NAJRUL ISLAM PRASANTA SARKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

  2. 2.XXX

Case History

  1. 17-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    Fixed Matter

    Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Supratim BhattacharyaView PDF

    In CRM(M) 132/2026, the High Court at Calcutta (Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri) adjourned the matter to 17.06.2026 on consent of both parties. The petitioner's counsel sought a two-day adjournment, and the State's APP indicated the Case Diary was unavailable. The court granted the adjournment request with both parties' agreement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 15-Jun-2026

    Application For Bail

    Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya

  5. 08-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Supratim BhattacharyaView PDF

  6. 19-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 19-May-2026

    Application For Bail

    Hon'ble Justice Uday Kumar

  8. 11-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM(M)/132/2026

casestatus.in Summary

In CRM(M) 132/2026, the High Court at Calcutta (Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri) adjourned the matter to 17.06.2026 on consent of both parties. The petitioner's counsel sought a two-day adjournment, and the State's APP indicated the Case Diary was unavailable. The court granted the adjournment request with both parties' agreement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case