NAYAN BARMAN DEBI SARKAR vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR — CRM(M)/131/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
CNR: WBCHCJ0018682026
Filing Number
CRM(M)/128/2026
Filing Date
11-May-2026
Registration No
CRM(M)/131/2026
Registration Date
14-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )
Sub-Category
Bail/Cancellation of bail ( 11 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL SECTION
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NAYAN BARMAN DEBI SARKAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR
-
2.XXX
Case History
-
12-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
12-Jun-2026
Application For Bail-POCSO
Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya
-
11-Jun-2026
Application For Bail-POCSO
Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya
-
10-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Justice Supratim BhattacharyaView PDF
Case Summary: CRM(M) 131/2026 The High Court at Calcutta's Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri adjourned the bail application of Nayan Barman (filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023) to 11th June, 2026, on consent of both counsel. No bail order was passed on this date as the petitioner's counsel sought accommodation for the day. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Jun-2026
Application For Bail-POCSO
Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya
-
09-Jun-2026
Application For Bail-POCSO
Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya
-
19-May-2026
Application For Bail-POCSO
Hon'ble Justice Uday Kumar
-
18-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRM(M)/131/2026
Case Summary: CRM(M) 131/2026 The High Court at Calcutta's Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri adjourned the bail application of Nayan Barman (filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023) to 11th June, 2026, on consent of both counsel. No bail order was passed on this date as the petitioner's counsel sought accommodation for the day. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts