TARAI FOUNDRY WORKS PVT LTD MAYANK ROY vs SHREE KARANI NIRMAN PVT LTD AND ORS — AP/5/2026
Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act ,1996 Section 11(6). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 22nd May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCJ0018472026
Filing Number
AP/5/2026
Filing Date
08-May-2026
Registration No
AP/5/2026
Registration Date
11-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Arindam Mukherjee
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Arindam Mukherjee
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )
Sub-Category
Arbitration ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
RULE SECTION
Decision Date
22-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.TARAI FOUNDRY WORKS PVT LTD MAYANK ROY
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHREE KARANI NIRMAN PVT LTD AND ORS
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
22-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Arindam MukherjeeView PDF
The High Court at Calcutta appointed Mr. Arindam Mitra as sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to resolve the dispute between petitioner Tarai Foundry Works (retired partner) and respondent partnership firm regarding Rs. 1,01,31,326/- owed upon retirement effective December 3, 2025. The arbitration shall proceed at Siliguri with arbitrator fees and expenses borne equally by both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-May-2026
Arbitration
Hon'ble Justice Arindam Mukherjee
-
19-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Arindam MukherjeeView PDF
-
19-May-2026
Arbitration
Hon'ble Justice Arindam Mukherjee
-
12-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Arindam MukherjeeView PDF
-
12-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. AP/5/2026
The High Court at Calcutta appointed Mr. Arindam Mitra as sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to resolve the dispute between petitioner Tarai Foundry Works (retired partner) and respondent partnership firm regarding Rs. 1,01,31,326/- owed upon retirement effective December 3, 2025. The arbitration shall proceed at Siliguri with arbitrator fees and expenses borne equally by both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts